Toyota FT-86 FR-S First Drive / Review / Specifications : AUTOCAR
NEWS
 

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 21

Thread: Toyota FT-86 FR-S First Drive / Review / Specifications : AUTOCAR

  1. #1
    Senior Member import_nation's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    2,084

    Toyota FT-86 FR-S First Drive / Review / Specifications : AUTOCAR

    So the first drive review of the Toyota FT86 Prototype is in. And it comes with specifications and sort of a mini review. This is the first official professional first car review of the FT-86 courtesy of CAR Magazine.

    Following that is the second review by Autocar of the same thing.

    Here is everything for all of you:

    Toyota FT-86 coupe (2012) CAR review

    By Ben Barry

    28 October 2011 10:55




    On 20 May 2011, CAR was allowed behind the wheel of a Toyota FT-86 development mule to get our own driving impressions and to give feedback to Toyota’s engineers during a secretive test session in Germany. Now, as the car is about to be unveiled at the 2011 Tokyo motor show, it’s time to reveal all.

    Where does the Toyota FT-86 name come from?

    ‘FT’ means Future Toyota, and is a label given to Toyota concept cars. The ‘86’ plays on the Toyota Corolla GT Coupe, the 1.6-litre DOHC, rear-wheel drive coupe that enthusiasts refer to by its AE86 chassis-code. The implication, then, is that the FT-86 is a 21st century AE86.

    The FT-86 tag will be dropped for production. At the time of our drive, there was still a great deal of debate as to what the car would be called. The engineers were very keen on the AE86 link, while the marketeers thought that very few people would know what that symbolised – they preferred Celica. It is, however, likely that an 86 suffix will appear in some markets.

    What's the specification of the new Toyota FT-86?

    The key info here is that Toyota is developing the FT-86 in tandem with Subaru, who will also sell the car, in much the same way that Citroen, Toyota and Peugeot sell the C3/Aygo/107. So, this explains why the FT-86 uses a Subaru 2.0-litre flat-four engine that produces around 200bhp and 170lb ft. Unlike pretty much everyone else these days, Toyota has shunned turbocharging, but the engine does benefit from Toyota’s D4S direct injection, which helps towards a C02 figure of around 160g/km – a similarly powerful Renaultsport Clio manages 190g/km.

    The engine is mounted up front, but low and relatively far back in the engine bay. It’s mated to a close-ratio Aisin gearbox (as used by Toyota elsewhere), while a Torsen rear differential sits between the driven rear wheels. The overall weight distribution is 53/47% front to rear, while the production car will weight around 1200kg.

    The platform is newly developed, and I managed to put eight of my size 11 footsteps between the front and rear wheelhubs, giving a wheelbase of around 2400mm – similar dimensions to a Mini hatchback.

    Elsewhere, there’s MacPherson strut front suspension, and a double wishbone rear-end. Mitsubishi supplies the springs, while test cars ran both Sachs and Showa shock absorbers – we tested the Sachs set-up.

    What's the FT-86 like inside?

    You sit low down – lower than a Porsche Cayman, claim the engineers – and squish into a comfortable seat with leather bolsters and grippy suede centres. The driving position is excellent. The FT-86 is strictly a 2+2: there was no room whatsoever for my legs in the back with a six-feet-tall driver in the front.

    The rest of the interior was still heavily camouflaged but we did see aluminum finishes on the rotary climate control dials, plus a row of aluminium-topped switches. Toyota’s ‘keyless go’ is standard, but we couldn't see the zip-up dashboard cover like on the concept car, forum watchers take note!

    What's the 2012 Toyota FT-86 like to drive?

    It’s great fun. There’s fantastic throttle response, quick, well weighted steering and a nice firm brake pedal. Add little inputs to the steering when you’re driving in a straight line at speed and the front end darts immediately – no slop, no roll, it’s just 100% obedient and alert.

    Clearly, it’s not a GT-R chaser, but that’s the whole point – the focus here is on dynamics you can explore at lower speeds. The flat-four zings happily and spins round the dial to 7500rpm, at which point you get a flashing light and a well-judged soft rev limiter – not a sudden cut-out. Doesn’t sound much like a flat-four though – perhaps this is intentional, as the flat-four sound is such a Subaru trademark.

    The gear ratios are closely stacked, and help to keep this modestly powered 2.0-litre spinning, but the ratios are well chosen so as not to be tiresome: 60mph in sixth gear brings up 2500rpm – relatively high, yes, but not daft. The gearshift could be slicker, but the lever has an engagingly short throw.

    Even without sliding it around, the FT-86 is very obviously rear-wheel drive: get to the limit in a second-gear corner and accelerate harder and you feel the back end point the front back exactly where you want it. It responds well to a really aggressive driving style. Shame that the stability controls’ Sport setting was too intrusive, although Toyota’s engineers said they had a less intrusive set-up that they were also experimenting with.

    It must be a blast to slide around…

    Drifting is a huge part of the appeal of the FT-86, just as it continues to be for the AE86. Our car was fitted with 215/45 R17 Michelin Green X tyres all round – aka Toyota Prius tyres. This made it laughably sideways in second gear, the back end stepping out with relatively mild – and sometimes almost no – provocation. For the average driver, this makes exploring the limits far easier than in anything else currently on sale.

    However, at higher speeds I found the balance less pleasing. In fast third-gear turns, for instance, the front end feels too soft and errs towards understeer – it could be pointier, firmer and more positive. Under provocation, the rear then comes around, but the FT-86 is so short that this transition can be very quick. Two factors then come into play: the first is the Torsen diff, which is more refined in day-to-day driving, but less precise than a mechanical differential when the rear tyres are struggling for purchase, so the level of control you have over the sliding rear end is compromised; the second point is the lack of power: adding power during slides helps you to bring things back under control, but in a high-speed FT-86 you’re more in the hands of momentum than you are able to dictate things with the throttle.

    So the FT-86's a hooligan oversteer specialist?

    At one point I found myself snapping into very fast oversteer, then suddenly snapping back and making an out-of-control excursion across the run-off area. My mistake, yes, but I’ve never had this feeling in any other modern rear-wheel drive car, 911 GT3 included.

    Is there going to be an FT-86 with more power and a mechanical differential?

    Turbocharging the flat-four would be straightforward (after all, that’s what Subaru does with the Impreza), but chief engineer Tetsuya Tada told us that he ‘doesn’t like turbos’ and has ‘decided to reject the numeric power war’. He also said that an R version of the FT-86 was coming with less weight, Brembo brakes (our test car’s stoppers were from Hitachi), a rollcage, a larger rear wing, no rear seats and, yes, a mechanical LSD but no more power.

    And bear in mind that Toyota had invited us for our input and that this was a fairly early car – things will be tweaked for production. Our cars were still disguised, although pictures of the FT-86 production car have leaked out in recent days.

    Other options are also on the cards: a convertible is ‘possible’, while an auto gearbox is confirmed – it’s a six-speed unit based on the eight-speeder in the high-performance Lexus ISF.

    Verdict

    The Toyota FT-86 is great news for enthusiasts: it’s affordable, frugal and relatively practical. You also don’t have to be a driving deity to explore its limits. If anything, we’d adjust the high-speed, on-limit balance (firmer front end, more progressive transition into oversteer, tighter differential), but that doesn’t undo the underlying fact that this is a great car, and one that trounces its closest rival, the Mazda MX-5, in the fun stakes.





    Toyota FT-86 2.0 First Drive

    Test date Friday, October 28, 2011

    Price as tested £20,000

    What is it?

    We’ve been waiting a long time for the Toyota FT-86. Literally, because we’ve seen a lot of the concept. But figuratively, too: Toyota is promising the FT-86 will deliver a return to sports car purity that is driven by feel and intuition, not lap times and lateral grip levels. We’ve wanted a car like that for a long while.

    “Sports cars have gotten boring,” Toyota says. “They’re only interested in going fast.” The FT-86 is meant to amend that, to bring speeds down but take the enjoyment up, not unlike the Caterham 7 Supersport which we’ve fallen for recently.

    The FT-86 is on a new platform that has been co-developed with Subaru (whose Subaru BRZ will be distinctly similar). We still don’t have all the technical details because it’s some way from launch – sales start in June 2012, following the production car’s unveiling at the end of November 2011.

    What I can tell you is that it’s “as small as possible for a four-seater sports car,” which means it weighs 1280kg. It has a 2.0-litre flat-four petrol engine in the front, naturally aspirated, which is supplied by Subaru but gets Toyota’s D4-S direct injection system. It makes 197bhp.

    The key things to add are these: it drives the rear wheels through a six-speed manual gearbox and a Torsen limited-slip differential. And the tyres are the same modest 215/45 R17 items you’ll find on a Toyota Prius.

    Oh, and the ESP can be completely switched off.

    What’s it like?

    As much fun as you’d hope. I drove a disguised car on a deserted airfield last May (wasn’t supposed to be able to tell you about it until the end of November, but recent revelations have brought that forward a bit ), and it still makes me smile to think about it now.

    First impressions: it feels light and compact, a bit like an MX-5. The driving position is low, straight and snug, with grippy front seats (and not a lot of room in the back).

    The Toyota FT-86 feels quick enough, too, with a precise if a touch notchy gearchange, and an engine note that’s a bit growly – there’s not much flat-four burble. Tweaking the NVH is high on Toyota’s ‘to-do’ list. It has a broad power curve - it revs to 7500 but there’s no desperate need to wind it that far past the mid-range.

    It’s hard to accurately guage the ride on a concrete airfield, but the FT-86 feels quite deftly set-up, light on its feet, with a touch of tyre roar that’s to be expected.

    It steers easily too. At 2.5 turns lock-to-lock the steering’s quick without being hyperactive, and is light-to-middling in weight. It all adds to the impression that this is going to be an easy car to get along with.

    Find a corner and you’ll find some roll, but its rate is well contained. The FT-86’s weight distribution is 53/47 per cent front/rear, so it’ll nudge into steady-state understeer if you’re on a constant throttle, where it grips moderately well and is pleasingly poised.

    The great thing about the FT-86 though is, as promised, it really handles. It lets you choose how you want to corner. Add any amount of power and it’ll turn at least neutral. Trail the brakes into a bend, give a mid-corner throttle-lift or, well, just give the steering a bit of a bung and lots of throttle and it’ll either straighten its line or give you armfuls of oversteer, utterly as you prefer.

    There’s still a bit of tweaking to do on the damping, but it’s 90 per cent of the way there. As it is, in third gear the FT-86 will run out of power to keep a long slide going (if you like that sort of thing), so inevitably it takes momentum rather than power to play games with the chassis. But if you add more power to compensate then you’ll want a turbo and bigger stoppers too, and that adds weight, and, well – that’s where the downward spiral starts, right?

    “The key development for the FT-86 is that it’s a front-engined, rear-drive car with intuitive handling,” says Toyota.

    “A fun car is a car you can control. We rejected the idea of a car developed using numbers. It must have front-engine/rear-drive, a naturally-aspirated engine and a low centre of gravity.”

    Should I buy one?

    I suspect those who do won’t regret it. The Toyota FT-86 will need a change in attitude: this car’s not about delivering ultimate acceleration or lap times, it’s just about having fun.

    The FT-86’s modest limits and power mean that it should prove enjoyable on the road: you’ll be able to get more out of it, more often, than you could a much faster and more theoretically capable sports car, whose reward is more often than not limited by visibility and sensibility.

    It’d be terrific fun on a track day, too. It’s light enough to not wear out its consumables quickly and, while an FT-86 wouldn’t be the fastest way around a circuit, there aren’t too many cars out there – certainly not at its predicted £20k-odd price tag – that could put a bigger smile on their driver’s face.

    Matt Prior

    Price: 20,000 (est); Top speed: n/a; 0-62mph: n/a; Economy: n/a; Co2: n/a; Kerbweight: 1280kg; Engine type: 2.0-litre, four-cylinder petrol; Power: 197bhp; Torque: n/a; Gearbox: six-speed manual


  2. Remove Advertisements
    FR-SForum.com
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    Senior Member import_nation's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    2,084

    Here is article from Autoguide as well.

    Toyota FT-86 “Trounces” Mazda MX-5 in the Fun Department: Report


    With photos leaking yesterday, today comes news of what the Toyota FT-86 is like to drive. But first, the specs. According to one of the journos at CAR Magazine, who had some seat time in the affordable sports car, look for the 2.0-liter to boxer 4-cylinder to develop around 200-hp and 170 lb-ft of torque. The car’s curb weight should be around 2,645 lbs, although the final production number has yet to be released and will differ from market to market. That said, look for a 0-60 time of around 7 seconds.
    As for the driving experience, it’s good says CAR‘s Ben Barry after a first-drive of a prototype model. In fact, he says it, “trounces its closest rival, the Mazda MX-5, in the fun stakes.” That’s quite a statement.
    Highlights include throttle response and steering with a rev-happy 7500 rpm redline, a soft rev limiter and a close-ratio 6-speed manual transmission. Less impressive is the feel of the shifter and the car’s willingness to understeer at higher speeds. Also in the negative column is the ‘Sport’ setting for the stability control system, which is still too intrusive – although engineers are reportedly working on a less restrictive version. And finally, there’s the Torsen limited slip differential, rather than a mechanical one, although Toyota engineers are reportedly also planning on offering a version with a mechanical LSD, as well as other upgraded components, like Brembo brakes.
    The drive was of a prototype model and Toyota intended to use the info to help develop the final production version, so we’ll await our first chance behind the wheel and relay our impressions as soon as possible.
    Under neath the bodywork is a MacPherson front end and a double wishbone rear suspension setup and the test car even had pricey Sachs shocks. The car’s weight balance is projected to be around 53/47.
    Other items of note is a standard keyless ignition system, while a six-speed automatic will be offered, reportedly based on the 8-speed in the IS-F, so look for some pretty quick shifts.

  4. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    441
    OK, for the good. The car sounds like it will be fun as hell to drive and has pretty good dynamics.

    The bad. The power sucks and 7 second 0-60 times are embarrassing IMO. So if you buy it, don't be racing anyone in a straight line. 4 cylinder monster boat family sedans like the SONATA hit 60 in around 7 and half seconds.

  5. #4
    Senior Member import_nation's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    2,084
    So this is what we know from all of this:

    -FT-86 means "Future Toyota 86". The 86 is obviously derived from the AE86.

    -The FT-86 name may be dropped for production, they are not sure yet. They may even consider the Celica?

    -The Subaru derived 2.0-litre flat-four engine will produce around 200bhp and 170lb ft

    -Toyota’s D4S direct injection

    -C02 figure of around 160g/km

    -Engine is mounted low and closer to the center of the car for better center of gravity and weight distribution

    -Close-ratio Aisin gearbox

    -Torsen rear differential

    -53/47% front to rear weight distribution

    -1280kg weight

    -Wheelbase of around 2400mm

    -MacPherson strut front suspension, and a double wishbone rear-end. Mitsubishi made springs. Test cars ran both Sachs and Showa shock absorbers.

    -You sit really low in the car, lower then a Porsche Cayman

    -Seats are made with leather bolsters and grippy suede centres

    -No room in rear for 6 ft tall adult

    -Aluminum finish on rotary climate control dials plus aluminum top switches

    -Standard Toyota 'keyless go'

    -7500 rpm redline

    -Soft rev limiter

    -Doesn't sound like traditional flat fours

    -60mph in sixth gear brings up 2500rpm

    -Short throw shifts

    -Stability controls Sport setting was too intrusive

    -215/45 R17 Michelin Green X Tires aka Toyota Prius tires...

    -Note about handling in high speed situations:

    "However, at higher speeds I found the balance less pleasing. In fast third-gear turns, for instance, the front end feels too soft and errs towards understeer – it could be pointier, firmer and more positive. Under provocation, the rear then comes around, but the FT-86 is so short that this transition can be very quick. Two factors then come into play: the first is the Torsen diff, which is more refined in day-to-day driving, but less precise than a mechanical differential when the rear tyres are struggling for purchase, so the level of control you have over the sliding rear end is compromised; the second point is the lack of power: adding power during slides helps you to bring things back under control, but in a high-speed FT-86 you’re more in the hands of momentum than you are able to dictate things with the throttle."

    -Test car’s brakes were made by Hitachi

    -R version of the FT-86 coming = lighterwith Brembo brakes, rollcage, larger rear wing, no rear seats and a mechanical LSD, same power and tq).

    -Convertible is possible

    -Auto gearbox is confirmed – it’s a six-speed unit based on the eight-speeder in the high-performance Lexus ISF.

    -0-62mph 7 seconds

    -140mph top speed?

    -37mpg mileage

  6. #5
    Member cfrp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    381
    HOLY thread whore batman. You just filled the first page with your threads. One thread for each topic? Reallly?!!?!

  7. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    162
    Why did the handling only get 3 stars :/

    All this talk about the car being a great handling car, doesn't need a ton of power, blah blah..


    Right down the drain...

  8. #7
    Senior Member import_nation's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    2,084
    It outhandles the Mazda Miata yet they gave it 3 stars.. It does not make any sense. I would consider the MX-5 to be one of the best handling cars out there. We will have to wait for the production to really see.

  9. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    69
    Yeah 3 stars is poor considering the low centre of gravity and all of the testing put into this car running it alongside the Porsche Cayman. Oh well hopefully like Car Magazine state this was an early test mule and things have been tweaked for production.

  10. #9
    Senior Member import_nation's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    2,084
    I'm sure stuff has changed with the handling, because they got the car in May, and 4 months have passed. and during that time they've been to the nurburgring and did that nurburgring race. i'm still hopeful

  11. #10
    Member cfrp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    381
    As sad as this sounds im happy with 170lbs of torque. Thats a decent amount.

  12. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    162
    1280kg weight

    Not as light as we thought... I was hoping for lighter. I am more interested in the R version. That one should be closer to 2500lbs

  13. #12
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    41
    oh no.. a TYPE R version... haha just kidding. on a more serious note

    "it’s a six-speed unit based on the eight-speeder in the high-performance Lexus ISF."

    Huh, I wonder how that feels like.

  14. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    69
    The platform is going to be great. We all know there will be tons of aftermarket handling stuff available right? If you aren't completely happy with the way it handles, change something. I bet at least 75% won't remain stock anyway. I wouldn't sweat the handling comment at all. As the others have said. The test mule was driven and written about months ago.

  15. #14
    Senior Member import_nation's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    2,084
    Like some have said. The car has since had more development. For sure Toyota paid attention to these two reviews and would like to improve on them. Toyota knows that handling is going to be one of the most important aspects. With all the hype and information they've provided us prior to these reviews the outcome does not match up at all.

    Another thing to note.. The tires that were on the car when it was tested may not be the tires that are going to be offered on the production. The tires are from the Toyota Prius for god sakes.

    Toyota most likely gave them not as amazing tires to prevent auto-journalists from offering more conclusive information about performance and handling. This was only a prototype so spring rates and shock valving were likely not completely refined....Crap tires help mask that. This technique has been done before.

  16. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    441
    Quote Originally Posted by import_nation View Post
    Like some have said. The car has since had more development. For sure Toyota paid attention to these two reviews and would like to improve on them. Toyota knows that handling is going to be one of the most important aspects. With all the hype and information they've provided us prior to these reviews the outcome does not match up at all.

    Another thing to note.. The tires that were on the car when it was tested may not be the tires that are going to be offered on the production. The tires are from the Toyota Prius for god sakes.

    Toyota most likely gave them not as amazing tires to prevent auto-journalists from offering more conclusive information about performance and handling. This was only a prototype so spring rates and shock valving were likely not completely refined....Crap tires help mask that. This technique has been done before.
    Great marketing prowess from Toyota if they did this. Give journalists a car that has been anticipated for YEARS, make it a dud so they underrate the experience, for what, sneak one over on the competition that really does not exist for this car. After all the ultra low engine centering, 'RING testing, etc, their own drivers did not see deficits, but auto journalists can?

    Really, I am starting to have my doubts. It should have been just the opposite. The journalists drive some sort of ultra ringer that wows the piss out of them, they give rave, glowing reviews, and start the stampede to dealers. Now we all sit back with the wait and see if they already failed approach.

    Not really very smart for a company trying to rebound and get back into sporty cars.

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Similar Threads

  1. Toyota 86 Test Drive/Review/Testing Videos
    By import_nation in forum Scion FR-S Pictures and Videos
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-30-2011, 04:41 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-30-2011, 04:14 PM
  3. Insideline Toyota 86 First drive REVIEW / TESTDRIVE
    By import_nation in forum FR-S General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-30-2011, 04:13 PM
  4. Autocar GT86 First Drive
    By import_nation in forum FR-S General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-30-2011, 04:11 PM
  5. Autoexpress Toyota 86 FIRST DRIVE Review!!
    By levin in forum FR-S General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-30-2011, 04:10 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.2