Toyota FT-86 Engine Details - Page 3
NEWS
 

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 61

Thread: Toyota FT-86 Engine Details

  1. #31
    Member Nemesis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Unknown
    Posts
    61

    ???

    Quote Originally Posted by onmikesline View Post
    toyota went down hill, i think ill pass on this car





  2. Remove Advertisements
    FR-SForum.com
    Advertisements
     

  3. #32
    Member Nemesis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Unknown
    Posts
    61
    I still think that there will be a N/A engine and a turbo'd engine, but I do have to say something in this cars defense. I have owned a car with 260hp/260lbft of torque(2.0 liter) and I had a daily driver 240sx which had 140hp and 152lbft of torque which was a very fun car to drive. If this boxer engine is torquey like they claim, it will be fun to drive.

  4. #33
    Member DOHC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    56
    Quote Originally Posted by Nemesis View Post
    I think the recalls and the latest lack of sports car from Toyota has left buyers disappointed, or at least thats how I feel....not sure what he meant by it.

  5. #34
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Raleigh Nc.
    Posts
    1
    If we dont see a turbo it will because of emissions related and not price. toyota has no problem asking for money!!!!!

  6. #35
    Junior Member bigbird's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    29
    Quote Originally Posted by Molsen ME109 View Post
    Don't forget about that sound! I'll be rolling on the throttle in 4th gear all day, gas mileage be damned!
    when i herd it was gonna be the boxster engine i nearly had a heart attack, best sounding motor out there that isnt in a 100K+ car.

    Quote Originally Posted by Molsen ME109 View Post
    They'll be competing with the genesis coupe. That has a turbo, so why not the toyota?
    im not sure it would compete with that, the genisis is so damn heavy, ive herd complaints about the 4cyl turbo verson being to heavy and with too much lag. this car with 250 hp...it will be faster then the base genisis but slower then the GT. if this car is released as ive herd its supposed to be sub 3k lbs (prolly sub 3200 turboed). this would compete with the mazdaspeed3, cobalt ss, GTI R32(if they still make that) and the WRX.

    Quote Originally Posted by Nemesis View Post

    i think hes referring to the recalls, which wouldnt effect this car besides price anyways. if anything the recalls will be a plus. their cars are already cheaper as a result of all this and its been blown up because of their share of the market place. it isnt a coincidence that the biggest fuss has been made at the biggest compeditor to US automakers. they are just playing the right cards and it may benifit us in the end.
    Last edited by bigbird; 03-05-2010 at 10:53 PM.

  7. #36
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by ra23celica View Post
    The D-4S is the Toyota direct (fuel into the cylinder) injection system which should be engineered on to the Subaru (H4?) engine. There is at least one Lexus model (IS250?) with this direct injection and it makes a useful amount more power and torque than the stock non D-*S engines.
    Most new Lexus car engines are direct injection (exceptions are the ES350, SC430, and GS460). But, there are two types of Toyota direct injection: D-4 and D-4S.

    D-4S is Toyota's high performance dual injection fuel system (port and direct). It's used in the 306hp 2GR-FSE in the IS350/GS350, the 380hp 1UR-FSE in the LS460, and the 416hp 2UR-GSE in the IS-F.

    The IS250's 4GR-FSE is the normal D-4 direct injection.

    Since the Subaru boxer engine has been fitted with Toyota's D-4S system, we should see around 175hp-200+hp depending on tuning and/or model.

    We might only see 200+hp if this engine uses Subaru's Dual-AVCS variable valve timing. And without a turbo, the boxer engine will have equal length exhaust, which means it won't have the signature Subie (turbo) boxer sound.
    Last edited by Jason.MZW20; 03-11-2010 at 07:45 AM.

  8. #37
    ADMINISTRATOR Administrator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario
    Posts
    177
    Quote Originally Posted by Jason.MZW20 View Post
    And without a turbo, the boxer engine will have equal length exhaust, which means it won't have the signature Subie (turbo) boxer sound.
    You mean the tractor sound? I have a Subie and that is the only way I can describe it.

    Nadeem

  9. #38
    Junior Member bigbird's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    29
    Quote Originally Posted by Jason.MZW20 View Post
    We might only see 200+hp if this engine uses Subaru's Dual-AVCS variable valve timing. And without a turbo, the boxer engine will have equal length exhaust, which means it won't have the signature Subie (turbo) boxer sound.

    really, i didnt know thats what made that sound, i thought it was just the HO factor. id still love it, two of my favorite automakers having a love child...cant go wrong.

    question however for anyone who knows, why does subie choose a boxer setup for their motors? dont they even do it with their 6 cyls too. what advantage does it provide other then space considerations?

    EDIT: found this
    http://www.motorimage.net/MIG/subaru...ence/?pg=boxer
    Last edited by bigbird; 03-14-2010 at 06:15 PM.

  10. #39
    Member Driftr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    usa
    Posts
    184
    Quote Originally Posted by bigbird View Post
    really, i didnt know thats what made that sound, i thought it was just the HO factor. id still love it, two of my favorite automakers having a love child...cant go wrong.

    question however for anyone who knows, why does subie choose a boxer setup for their motors? dont they even do it with their 6 cyls too. what advantage does it provide other then space considerations?

    EDIT: found this
    Motor Image Group - Subaru - The Subaru Difference
    boxer engines are the most balanced engines available and they dont require counter weights

  11. #40
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    5
    I think a 2.0 4 cylinder should make about 200 hp and around 170 lbs of torque. It would be a good balance of power along with the weight.

  12. #41
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    4
    boxer design also lowers the cars center of gravity which is a big plus!

  13. #42
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    87
    in terms of the whole turbo/non turbo discussion... Isnt the turbo version only going to be the subaru version, and the toyota version will only be availabe in japan, everywhere else will get the subaru version?

  14. #43
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    185
    Quote Originally Posted by coop3422 View Post
    in terms of the whole turbo/non turbo discussion... Isnt the turbo version only going to be the subaru version, and the toyota version will only be availabe in japan, everywhere else will get the subaru version?
    no. everywhere will get the toyota version. theres also a turbo version coming out for the ft86. pretty much the only thing that will be different between the two cars is the drivetrain(rwd/awd) and the exterior of the car. everything else is said to be almost identical.

  15. #44
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    87
    Quote Originally Posted by car_crazy View Post
    no. everywhere will get the toyota version. theres also a turbo version coming out for the ft86. pretty much the only thing that will be different between the two cars is the drivetrain(rwd/awd) and the exterior of the car. everything else is said to be almost identical.
    do you have a link to where they said their will be a turbo version? Everything rescent I've read says itll be a 2.0 n/a engine, and that they were knocking the hp down to 160 for economical reasons. I'd love to be wrong tho, lol

  16. #45
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    172
    Quote Originally Posted by coop3422 View Post
    do you have a link to where they said their will be a turbo version? Everything rescent I've read says itll be a 2.0 n/a engine, and that they were knocking the hp down to 160 for economical reasons. I'd love to be wrong tho, lol
    I think hes talking about the FT-86 G's Sport concept which is rumored to be getting a 2.0L turbo charged engine. I don't think 160hp will be for the regular FT-86/FR-S. I think they're knocking down the hp numbers for the hybrid version. At 160hp it will be significantly underpowered against its competition and Toyota is very aware of that.


    http://www.ft86talk.com/forums/pictu...t-concept.html

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Register Now

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-23-2011, 03:42 PM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-02-2011, 02:36 PM
  3. Toyota talks details for efforts to catch up with rival sales in coming years
    By import_nation in forum General Automotive Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-01-2011, 05:40 PM
  4. Scion FR-S engine bay picture leaked! D-4S boxer engine
    By 8-SiX in forum Scion FR-S Pictures and Videos
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-11-2011, 12:43 PM
  5. Toyota FT-86 / Scion FR-S: Exciting New Details
    By AutoGuide.com in forum Scion FR-S News
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-03-2011, 02:45 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.2